Comments on: Tao of Supreme Court, Medical Marijuana & State’s Rights – Dec 08 http://cannabistv.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/supreme-court-medical-marijuana-states-rights-dec-08/ Rich Legacy & Great Potential of Cannabis Hemp Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:31:48 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Tao of Supreme Court, Medical Marijuana & State’s Rights - Dec 08 http://cannabistv.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/supreme-court-medical-marijuana-states-rights-dec-08/#comment-426 Tao of Supreme Court, Medical Marijuana & State’s Rights - Dec 08 Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:34:08 +0000 http://cannabistv.wordpress.com/?p=431#comment-426 [...] See the original post here: Tao of Supreme Court, Medical Marijuana & State’s Rights - Dec 08 [...] [...] See the original post here: Tao of Supreme Court, Medical Marijuana & State’s Rights – Dec 08 [...]

]]> By: Eric Dondero http://cannabistv.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/supreme-court-medical-marijuana-states-rights-dec-08/#comment-423 Eric Dondero Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:12:16 +0000 http://cannabistv.wordpress.com/?p=431#comment-423 So, let me get this straight. It was Chief Justice Roberts who issued the ruling. Roberts is a Bush appointee. Bush famously said in an interview in 2000 when he ran for President that he would appoint Judges who would "leave it up to the states," when it came to legalizing marijuana. Shouldn't Bush be getting the credit here for following through on his promise? A, sort of, last minute hurrah! to freedom lovers nationwide. Let's enjoy it while we can. Certainly Obama's AG Eric Holder doesn't hold out any promise of being a friend of liberty. So, let me get this straight. It was Chief Justice Roberts who issued the ruling. Roberts is a Bush appointee. Bush famously said in an interview in 2000 when he ran for President that he would appoint Judges who would “leave it up to the states,” when it came to legalizing marijuana.

Shouldn’t Bush be getting the credit here for following through on his promise? A, sort of, last minute hurrah! to freedom lovers nationwide.

Let’s enjoy it while we can. Certainly Obama’s AG Eric Holder doesn’t hold out any promise of being a friend of liberty.

]]> By: Tao of Supreme Court, Medical Marijuana & State’s Rights - Dec 08 http://cannabistv.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/supreme-court-medical-marijuana-states-rights-dec-08/#comment-422 Tao of Supreme Court, Medical Marijuana & State’s Rights - Dec 08 Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:13:01 +0000 http://cannabistv.wordpress.com/?p=431#comment-422 [...] the777group wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt In the spirit of the Lao Tzu and the I Ching, the Supreme Court of the United States has accomplished much by doing nothing. The court let stand lower court rulings on a case appealed by the City of Garden Grove in Orange County, California, whose police force felt that returning medical marijuana (Cannabis) to a patient would put them in conflict with federal law.  Headline: Dec 2, 2008 - Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Case on Seized Marijuana - The appeal supported by numerous law enforcement organizations and District Attorneys, yet opposed by California’s Attorney General Jerry Brown finally makes it to the U.S. Supreme Court, with the interesting lower court ruling stance that the medical marijuana patient enjoyed a “federally protected property right” to his medicine. [...] [...] the777group wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt In the spirit of the Lao Tzu and the I Ching, the Supreme Court of the United States has accomplished much by doing nothing. The court let stand lower court rulings on a case appealed by the City of Garden Grove in Orange County, California, whose police force felt that returning medical marijuana (Cannabis) to a patient would put them in conflict with federal law.  Headline: Dec 2, 2008 - Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Case on Seized Marijuana - The appeal supported by numerous law enforcement organizations and District Attorneys, yet opposed by California’s Attorney General Jerry Brown finally makes it to the U.S. Supreme Court, with the interesting lower court ruling stance that the medical marijuana patient enjoyed a “federally protected property right” to his medicine. [...]

]]>